What is a common implication of a divisible contract?

A divisible contract is structured in such a way that it can be divided into distinct parts, each of which can be performed fully or partially without affecting the overall validity of the contract. Thus, one key implication of a divisible contract is that performance can indeed be partial without incurring a penalty. This is particularly advantageous in situations where complete performance is not feasible or necessary at once, allowing parties to fulfill their obligations in stages.

For example, in construction contracts, a contractor might complete certain phases of work while other phases are still pending. This flexibility helps accommodate situations where timing or resource availability might not align for full execution of the contract's terms at once.

While other options touch on aspects related to contracts, they don’t specifically capture the essence of what makes a divisible contract unique. Divisible contracts can involve multiple parties, but they are not limited to them, and thus option B is not correct. Option C relates to adjustments in pricing that don't inherently flow from the divisible nature of a contract; price adjustments must typically be explicitly outlined and agreed upon. Lastly, while negotiations can occur within any contract, not all terms in a divisible contract need to be negotiable, so option D does not pertain specifically to the nature of divisible contracts.