What is a key factor for establishing a prima facie case for non-representative jury selection?

To establish a prima facie case for non-representative jury selection, it is essential to demonstrate that a specific group was not fairly represented in the jury pool. A fair representation means that individuals from that group have been systematically excluded or underrepresented, which can lead to concerns regarding impartiality in the judicial process. This lack of fair representation signifies that the jurors chosen may not reflect the diversity or perspectives of the community, potentially affecting the outcome of trials and the fairness of the justice system.

In this context, other responses do not accurately address the need for establishing a prima facie case. For instance, the assertion that a group is not distinctive overlooks the fundamental requirement for fair representation; a group can be distinctive and still not be adequately represented. Moreover, claiming underrepresentation occurred by random chance does not account for systematic issues in selection processes that need to be examined to establish a prima facie case. Lastly, stating that a group has a majority representation contradicts the concern over non-representative selection since majority representation would suggest that the group is sufficiently included, not excluded, from the jury pool.

Thus, the correct choice highlights the necessity of demonstrating unfairness in the representation of a specific group within jury selection processes.