Which conditions must be met for defendants in a federal statutory interpleader case?

Enhance your readiness for the NCBE Uniform Bar Exam with our engaging quizzes featuring detailed explanations and a variety of question types. Start preparing effectively today!

In a federal statutory interpleader case, one of the primary requirements is that there must be complete diversity between the plaintiff and at least two of the defendants. This means that those defendants must satisfy the diversity jurisdiction requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Specifically, at least two defendants must be citizens of different states from the plaintiff, enabling the federal court to take jurisdiction over the case based on diversity.

This requirement is central to interpleader because it seeks to resolve multiple claims over the same stake and prevents the plaintiff from being subject to multiple lawsuits regarding the same issue. In situations where the plaintiff's citizenship is the same as one or more defendants, diversity is not met, which lies at the heart of the jurisdictional basis for federal interpleader.

The other conditions mentioned in the remaining options do not align with the necessary criteria for a federal statutory interpleader. For instance, all defendants need not be from the same state as the plaintiff, there is no requirement for all defendants to have a minimum controversy amount of $500, and having one defendant residing in the same state as the plaintiff does not fulfill the diversity requirement. Therefore, the correct condition is for at least two defendants to be diverse from the plaintiff,

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy